Legal Opinion

Garlock v. OptimisCorp

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 27, 2023No. 3:22-cv-05108Unknown

1Opinion

1 The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 GARLOCK et al., 9 Plaintiffs, 10 Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-5108-BJR 11 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION OPTIMISCORP, FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 14 Defendant. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Defendant OptimisCorp (“Optimis”) holds a promissory note that is secured by liens on 18 19 the personal residences of Patrick Garlock (“Garlock”) and Michael Jennings (“Jennings”) 20 (collectively “Plaintiffs”).1…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Victoria Zetwick v. County of YoloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Merlin Hansen Dolores Hansen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. JP Morgan Chase Bank AccountCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Peck v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API