Legal Opinion
United States v. Edward Gluklick
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1986No. 85-1687PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendants Edward Gluklick 1 and Gluck Construction company appeal from an order of the district court granting judgment in favor of plaintiff, the United States, on its complaint brought pursuant to the False Claims Act. On appeal, defendants challenge service as defective. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
On December 16,1983, the United States filed a complaint against defendants Edward Gluklick and Gluck Construction Company under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 231-235 and 28 U.S.C. § 1345. The complaint alleged that defendants were awarded a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Carl Thomas Rauch, III v. Day and Night Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Meetings & Expositions, Inc. v. Tandy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Robert Norlock v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- John A. McCurdy Jr., M.D. John A. McCurdy Jr., M.D., Facs, Inc. v. American Board of Plastic SurgeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Dr. S.B. Pardazi v. Cullman Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- George Kersh v. Norman DerozierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Combs v. Nick Garin TruckingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.