Legal Opinion

Nease v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 28, 2005No. A-8560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

A Juneau police officer stopped Peter Nease after he observed that the passenger-side brake light on Nease’s pickup truck did not light up when he stopped at a traffic light. 1 When the officer contacted Nease, he observed signs that Nease was driving while intoxicated, and ultimately arrested Nease for that offense. 2 Nease argues that the evidence of his intoxication should have been suppressed because the police officer used his malfunctioning brake light as a pretext to stop him for driving while intoxicated. For the reasons below, we reject this claim and affirm…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Beauvois v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grohs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  2. Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
  3. Bessette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  4. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  5. Chase v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API