Nease v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Chief Judge.
A Juneau police officer stopped Peter Nease after he observed that the passenger-side brake light on Nease’s pickup truck did not light up when he stopped at a traffic light. 1 When the officer contacted Nease, he observed signs that Nease was driving while intoxicated, and ultimately arrested Nease for that offense. 2 Nease argues that the evidence of his intoxication should have been suppressed because the police officer used his malfunctioning brake light as a pretext to stop him for driving while intoxicated. For the reasons below, we reject this claim and affirm…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Beauvois v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grohs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
- Bessette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
- Chase v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010