Legal Opinion
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 23, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1462PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Despite the breadth of the parties’ briefing, there is a narrow question before the Court: whether Plaintiffs have demonstrated that Defendants have not produced the complete administrative record regarding the renewal of the license of the Cricket Hollow Zoo by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Even though the parties’ briefing revisits the question whether the administrative record is required in the first instance, the Court already answered that request in the affirmative in a Minute Order issued January 22,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Pacific Shores Subdivision California Water District v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Sonny PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- UnitedHealthCare Ins. Co. v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Sonny PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- David Shaun Neal v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2020
- Michael Van Bemmelen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.