Legal Opinion

State v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 14, 1991No. 88-057PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction, after court trial, for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He moved to suppress evidence obtained when he was stopped for running a police roadblock, claiming that the roadblock was illegal under State v. Martin, 145 Vt. 562, 496 A.2d 442 (1985). The trial court denied the motion because defendant had “abandoned the protection” of the fourth amendment by driving through the roadblock, and because the police had probable cause to arrest defendant for failing to stop. We hold defendant’s motion was improperly denied and reverse and remand.

On the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Carl BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Robert Lavon Nooks, Sinclair Hughes and John Henry BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vargas Manufacturing Co. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  2. Castle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  4. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
  5. State v. Treyez L. McEachinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API