Legal Opinion

In Re Registrant J.M.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 28, 2001PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

LaVECCHIA, J.

This is yet another challenge to the Attorney General Guidelines for Law Enforcement for the Implementation of Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Laws, specifically the Registrant Risk Assessment Scale (“RRAS”) and the Registrant Risk Assessment Scale Manual (“Manual”) components of those guidelines. Previous challenges to the RRAS and the Manual have been addressed by this Court. In re Registrant G.B., 147 N.J. 62, 69, 685 A.2d 1252 (1996); In re Registrant C.A., 146 N.J. 71, 100-01, 679 A.2d 1153 (1996); Doe v. Poritz,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. In re the Registrant, C.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. W.P. v. PoritzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Registrant M.F.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. State ex rel. J.P.F.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. In re T.S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  4. A.A. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  5. In re Registrant M.A.S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API