Legal Opinion
State v. Fuhriman
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 2002No. 27682PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Judge.
Jason Howard Fuhriman pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, I.C. § 37 — 2732(c)(1), pursuant to a plea agreement with the state. Fuhriman appeals from his judgment of conviction alleging, inter alia, that the state breached the plea agreement. Fuhriman also challenges the length of his sentence and the denial of his Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Fuhriman was charged with possession of methamphetamine. Fuhriman originally pleaded not guilty to the charge, but agreed to change his plea on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hayes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ShaferIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. AllenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. JonesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.