Legal Opinion

El Dorado v. Coats

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 31, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ponder, Special Judge,,

(after stating the facts): The appellees, W. M. Coats, receiver, El Dorado Gas Company and Central States Gas & Electric Company, claim that the latter company has the exclusive right of supplying the city of El Dorado and its inhabitants gas for domestic and commercial purposes. That this exclusive right and privilege is given and granted to it by virtue of a certain ordinance passed by the city council on March 21, 1921, under which J. W. Atkins, his successor and assigns, were given this franchise, and that Atkins organized the El Dorado Gas Company, and transferred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Newton v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Lehigh Water Co. v. EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Commissioners on Inland Fisheries v. Holyoke Water Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Little Rock Railway & Electric Co. v. DowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens' Pipe Line Co. v. Twin City Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. City of Fort Smith v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Handley v. City of Hope, ArkansasDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
  4. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. West Memphis Power & Water Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of RectorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API