Commissioners on Inland Fisheries v. Holyoke Water Power Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Gray, J.*
The material facts of this case, as appearing by the report of Mr. Justice Colt, before whom the hearing was had, are few and simple.
The defendants, under the authority conferred upon them by their charter, St. 1859, c. 6, are the owners by purchase of a dam across the Connecticut River, and the locks and canals connected therewith, at Holyoke in this Commonwealth, erected by the Hadley Falls Company in accordance with its charter, St, 1848, c. 222, and kept up ever since, for the purpose of creating and maintaining a water power for manufacturing and mechan.cal purposes. .
The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- TERRETT & OTHERS v. Taylor & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Philadelphia and Wilmington Railroad Co. v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Close v. Glenwood CemeterySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & St. Paul Railway Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Leep v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Attorney General v. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- City of Detroit v. Detroit & Howell Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.