Pennell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Eon. W. O. Thomas, Judge. The court committed error in refusing the demurrer to the evidence. The court committed error in refusing the instruction in the nature of a demurrer offered by the defendant at the close of all the evidence. S.chaub v. Railroad, 133 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Eon. W. O. Thomas, Judge. The court committed error in refusing the demurrer to the evidence. The court committed error in refusing the instruction in the nature of a demurrer offered by the defendant at the close of all the evidence. S.chaub v. Railroad, 133 Mo. App. 444; Schmidt v. Railroad, 191 Mo. 215; Green v. Railroad, 192 Mo. 131; Walker v. Railroad, 193 Mo. 453; Stotler v. Railroad, 204 Mo. 619; Hayden v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 566; Huggart v. Railroad, 134 Mo. 679. The court did not err in overruling defendant’s demurrer, and the cause was properly…
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by tbe negligence of defendant in the operation' of one of its trains over a street crossing- in Kansas City. The appeal is prosecuted by defendant from a judgment of one thousand dollars recovered by plaintiff in the circuit court where the cause was tried before a jury.
The injury occurred between eleven and twelve o’clock on the morning of December 7, 1908, at the intersection Of Tenth and Hickory streets. Tenth street runs east and west and is occupied by four tracks of the Union Pacific Railway Company which…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Vidal v. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924
- Schupp v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Vidal v. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924