Legal Opinion

Michael Seals v. Francisco Jacquez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 23, 2015No. 13-16930UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Izell Seals appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Seals’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Seals filed pro se supplemental briefs on July 14 and 15, and August 19, 2015, which we have considered. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the briefing and record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Kinte Graves v. Scott McEwenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Raul Joe Aldrete v. Christian PfeifferDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API