Kinlaw v. Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
NEWBY, Justice.
This case presents the question whether the trial court erred by declaring defendant’s individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”) exempt from execution and by ordering that any future withdrawals from defendant’s Fidelity IRAs comply with an escrow arrangement. We conclude that the trial court properly applied N.C.G.S. § lC-1601(a)(9) and acted within its broad equitable power. Therefore, we affirm the holding of the Court of Appeals that N.C.G.S. § lC-1601(a)(9) exempts defendant’s IRAs from plaintiff’s judgment against defendant. We reverse, however, the decision of the Court of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Rousey v. JacowaySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Creech v. MelnikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- Blackburn v. Trustees of Guilford Technical Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- In Re Estate of SkinnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Cooper v. CroweDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2017
- In Re Estate of SkinnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.