Burdett v. Phillips & Bro.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 49—PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM MARION COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. There was no sufficient proof to sustain the attachment. (Civil Code, sec. 194, subsec. 2.) The proof clearly sustains the attachment. (Sec. 194, Civil Code, sub-sec. 2.)
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE COFER
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellees brought this action against the appellant,, and sued out a general attachment, which they caused to be levied upon a lot of hogs and other personal property, and an undivided interest in a tract of land.
The grounds for the attachment were controverted, but the court sustained it, and ordered the attached property tO' be sold, and this appeal questions the correctness of that ruling.
Two grounds for attachment were alleged, viz: (1) “That the defendant has sold and disposed of his property, and is *247about to sell and dispose of his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jenkins v. Jackson, Loving & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
3Cited by8 opinions
- Francis v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
- O'Kane v. VinnedgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
- First National Bank v. D. Kiefer Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
- Deposit Bank of Owensboro v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
- Miller's v. People's BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.