Ammerman v. Bd. of Educ., Nicholas County
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentWintersheimer, Justice
I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because the statute of limitations does not bar the civil rights claims presented when there is a strong case of continuing sexual harassment as there is here.
The General Assembly of Kentucky has authorized the Commonwealth to be sued for a violation of the Kentucky Civil Rights Act codified in KRS 344.010 et seq. My reading of the record in this ease indicates that the Board of Education has candidly conceded that Chapter 344 amounts to a waiver of sovereign immunity, both in its original brief and its response to the peti*801tion for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Withers v. University of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
- Franklin County, Ky. v. MaloneKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.