Legal Opinion

LM General Insurance Company v. Hartenfels

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00827Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-cv-00827 v. (SAPORITO, C.M.J.) ROBERT HARTENFELS, individually and as administrator of the estates of Hannah Hartenfels and Debbie Boyd, Defendant. MEMORANDUM This matter comes before the court on a Rule 42(b) motion to bifurcate by the plaintiff, LM General Insurance Company (“LM General”). Doc. 9. The motion is fully briefed and ripe for decision. Doc. 10; Doc. 14. This is a diversity action between an insurer, plaintiff LM General, and its policyholder, defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barr Laboratories, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Griffith v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Reading Tube Corp. v. Employers Insurance of WausauDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Eizen Fineburg & McCarthy, P.C. v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API