State v. Keller
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Defendants appeal from their conviction of second degree burglary. Appellate counsel did not try the case.
In recent months we have reviewed the records of other criminal appeals of defendants represented by court-appointed counsel. We note, with increasing concern, that it seems to be standard procedure for the accused to quarrel with court-appointed counsel, or to develop an undertone of studied antagonism and claimed distrust, or to be reluctant to aid or cooperate in preparation of a defense. This appears to be done in order to argue on appeal that the accused was deprived of due process…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. ModeWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- In RE WOODS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Personal Restraint of StensonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In re the Personal Restraint of StensonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. PicheWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State v. KolocotronisWashington Supreme Court · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.