Legal Opinion

People v. D'Alessio

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided December 1, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alan J. Meyer, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss People’s complaints on the ground that People failed to prosecute within 90 days as required by law.

On December 6, 1985 defendant, Paul D’Alessio, was arrested and charged with operating a motor vehicle while *1006intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]), leaving the scene of an accident (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600) and resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30). At the time of the arrest, D’Alessio was given a desk appearance ticket (DAT) with a return date of January 10, 1986.

On January 10, 1986 defendant came to court in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. ColonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1981
  4. People v. ColonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1982
  5. People v. RichbergCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. Consolidated Edison Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
  2. People v. FysekisCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
  3. People v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
  4. People v. Kwan HanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
  5. People v. Consolidated Edison Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API