Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Payson City Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2003No. 20010233PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 This case arises from the decision of the Payson City Council (Payson City or City Council) to deny Plaintiffs' two applications to rezone property within Payson City (the property) from R-1-A low density residential/agricultural use to R-2-75 high density residential use. The trial court determined that Payson City's decision was arbitrary and capricious because it was not supported by "substantial evidence." The court of appeals reversed the decision of the trial court, holding that application of the "substantial evidence" standard was erroneous because…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. King County v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTHWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. First National Bank of Boston v. County Board of EqualizationUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Springville Citizens for a Better Community v. City of SpringvilleUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Marshall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Outfront Media, LLC v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. McElhaney v. City of MoabUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Petersen v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Suarez v. Grand CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API