Legal Opinion
Strachan v. Meyering
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1912No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Case by James Strachan against John H. Meyeringand another for fraud. A judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
The plaintiff holds an assignment of any claim his wife has against defendants. It is his claim that he is entitled to recover a large sum because of false representations made to himself and wife by the defendants, who were in the real estate business."
The trial of the case was entered upon and some testimony taken, when the following occurred:
"The Court: If I understand from your opening, Mr. Safford, and from this case as it has thus far developed, you make no claim that there was any representation as to the value of this property as a result of which you were defrauded ?
"Mr. Safford: No.
"…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hokanson v. OatmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baloyan v. Furniture Exhibition Building Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- McGough v. HopkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Obremski v. DworzaninMichigan Supreme Court · 1946