Hokanson v. Oatman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Sessions, J. Assjumpsit by Victor Hokanson against Charles Oat-man for fraud. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
The plaintiff’s declaration avers that defendant, a real estate agent, offered for sale to plaintiff 80 acres of land, “and agreed to sell the same to said plaintiff for the price the owner then asked for the same, and said plaintiff then and there agreed to and with said de*513fendant to pay him, said defendant, the price that the owner then asked for said property; but said plaintiff avers that said defendant, at the time and place aforesaid, falsely and fraudulently pretended and stated and claimed to this plaintiff ‘ that the owner asked $1,200 for said property, and that that was the owner’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fairchild v. . McMahonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- McDonald v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Stoney Creek Woolen Co. v. SmalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- First National Bank v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Barnard v. ColwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harper v. AdametzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Heiman v. FelderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Zichlin v. DillSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Wegner v. HerkimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.