Legal Opinion
Matter of Mut. Ben. Life Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 8, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
258 N.J. Super. 356 (1992)
609 A.2d 768
IN THE MATTER OF THE REHABILITATION OF MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 2, 1992.
Decided July 8, 1992.
Before Judges O'BRIEN, HAVEY and CONLEY.
Marc S. Friedman argued the cause for appellant Maryland National Bank (Friedman Siegelbaum; Weinberg & Green, attorneys; Helene H. Wingens, Carl E. Eastwick, Earl F. Leitas and Marc S. Friedman, on the brief).
Gregory G. Little argued the cause for appellant First Tennessee Bank National Association (McCarter & English; Hunton & Williams, attorneys;…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Garamendi v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Venetsanos v. Zucker, Facher & ZuckerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- State v. VolpiniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- In Re the Rehabilitation of National Heritage Life InsuranceCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
- AzStar Casualty Co. v. Allied General Agency (In Re Allied General Agency)District Court, D. Arizona · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.