Legal Opinion
United States v. Wincel Hendrix
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 15, 1974No. 1231, Docket 74-1603PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKEL, District Judge:
Convicted upon seemingly powerful evidence, and sentenced to concurrent terms of which the longer is for 10 years’ imprisonment, the defendant complains that the trial judge committed reversible error by adding two years to what the sentence might otherwise have been because he was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had perjured himself. A lesser question is whether there was prejudicial impropriety in Judge Mishler’s intervention to press for corroboration of testimony by defendant’s wife on his behalf after she had volunteered that such…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. John Christopher DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Herbert BaylinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Angelo Ruggiero, Gene Gotti and John CarnegliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.