Legal Opinion

Horton v. Wachtman Drilling Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1963No. 40157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN,••■Justice.-' \

' Wachtriiafr‘Driiling' Company, 'a'partner- ' shi-py referred ⅛0- as plaintiff, commenced an action against Norman W. Horton, referred to as defendant:, to-recover a personal judgment arid to' establish and foreclose a lien, upon an' oil and gas lease owned by defendant. The jury'returned a verdict for plain-,' tiff'and judgment’was entered the.reori. De- . feiidárit appeals from the order overruling his' motion" for a new trial.

PLEADINGS

Plaintiff alleged two causes of action in its first petition for certain labor, services and materials furnished on the oil and gas…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Key v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. William M. Graham Oil & Gas Co. v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Fitch v. BraddockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co. v. McDowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Wass v. VickerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. K & H Well Service, Inc. v. Tcina, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. In Re TefertillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Shawver & Son, Inc. v. TefertillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Schubloom v. DONAVON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Wilkinson v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API