Legal Opinion

People v. Malbrough

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1961No. Crim. 6734PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

— From judgments of guilty, entered on jury verdicts, reduced on motions for a new trial from robbery in the second degree to grand theft from the person (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 2), defendants appeal.

Facts: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v. Newland, 15 Cal.2d 678, 681 [104 P.2d 778]), the record discloses:

On November 22, 1959, at approximately 8 :45 in the evening, Officers Bussell and Sakoda were on duty riding in an unmarked police car in the vicinity of Stanford Avenue between Fourth and Fifth Streets in the city of Los Angeles. Seeing defendants…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. JermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. SamaniegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. WileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API