Legal Opinion

Goff v. Goff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1924No. 15088PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

In the view taken of this case here it is only necessary to consider the second and third assignments of error, which read as follows:

“Second. The court erred in sustaining objections of plaintiff to certain evidence offered and tendered by defendant.
“Third. That the court erred in its findings of fact and conclusions of law.”

A brief statement of the facts necessary to a discussion of the questions involved is taken from the brief of plaintiff as follows:

“That the land herein involved was selected by Edgar H Goff, deceased, under the homestead law of the United States on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. In Re Barnes' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Frary's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Hicks v. JeffressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Essex v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. JOHNSON BY AND THROUGH LACKEY v. SchickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. McMahon v. FoleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API