Legal Opinion

Vitronics v. Conceptronic

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 13, 1995No. CV-91-696-LPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Vitronics v. Conceptronic CV-91-696-L 03/13/95 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Vitronics Corporation v. #C-91-696-L Conceptronic, Inc. ORDER Analogous to the complexities typical to patent infringement issues, since inception this case has followed a long and tumult­ uous course. During the course of a hearing on December 7, 1994, counsel for Conceptronic, Inc. indicated to the court concern over a motion for clarification, submitted by the plaintiff, repre­ senting that the defendant had not directly infringed the '502 patent. The defendant incorporated the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. Steven Wynne v. Tufts University School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API