Tabankin v. Codd
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*894Appeal dismissed, with costs. Since the constitutional issues on the basis of which this appeal is taken are but a restatement of questions whose merit has been clearly adjudicated against appellant’s position (e.g., United States v Miller, 307 US 174; Presser v Illinois, 116 US 252, 265; United States v Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 553; Matter of Moore v Gallup, 267 App Div 64, 67, affd 293 NY 846; Burton v Sills, 53 NJ 86, app dsmd 394 US 812; United States v Karnes, 437 F2d 284, cert den 402 US 1008), they must be held to lack the requisite substantiality to sustain this appeal as of right under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Presser v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Burton v. SillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moore v. GallupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Klenosky v. New York City Police DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Demyan v. MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Adoption of David A. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Laier v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.