Legal Opinion

Scheinman v. Glass and Braus

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 23, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01551Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT STANLEY SCHEINMAN, Plaintiff, No. 3:18-cv-1551 (SRU) v. GLASS & BRAUS LLC, et al., Defendants. RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Stanley Scheinman, proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit against Glass & Braus LLC and Safeguard Property Management (collectively, “Defendants”), challenging Defendants’ communications and actions in connection with their efforts to collect on a mortgage debt. He asserts violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act,

15 U.S.C. § 1692

et seq., and various Connecticut statutes. Currently before the court is Glass…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Jackson Leeds v. Jonathan S. Meltz, Anthony Mansfield, Susan Ferraro, Merrick T. Rossein, Unknown John and Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Melanie Geisler v. Orlando R. Petrocelli and Pinnacle Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API