Legal Opinion
American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Employers' of Wausau
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 24, 1990No. C3-89-2241, C3-90-57PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.
American Hoist & Derrick (Amhoist) appeals from the trial court’s determination that respondent Employers’ of Wausau (Wausau), an excess insurer, has no obligation to provide “drop down” coverage at the levels of insurance occupied by two insolvent excess insurers. In appeal C3-90-57, appellant Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association (MIGA) contends the trial court erroneously interpreted Wau-sau’s policy language. The appeals of Am-hoist and MIGA have been consolidated by this court.
FACTS
Amhoist purchases multi-level product liability insurance to protect…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Donegal Mutual Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados v. Librotex, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
- Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados v. Librotex, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1997
- National Union Fire Ins. v. Miss. Ins. Guar. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.