Legal Opinion

Ekren v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1953No. 7360PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. SATHRE, Judge.

The plaintiff brings this action against the defendant for damages for .personal injury and property damages resulting from a collision between’his car and the defendant's train on a crossing at Kensal, Stuts-man County, North Dakota. He alleges in his complaint that the accident was due to the negligence of the defendant in failing to give proper signals when approaching the crossing and for failing to maintain proper safeguards at said crossing. In its answer tjie defendant denies any negligence on its part and alleges that the accident and damages to the plaintiff were due…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brommer v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  2. New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. MaidmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  3. Martin v. ParkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Schnell v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. TrippCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Olson v. Cass County Electric Co-Operative, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Goulet v. O'KEEFFENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Doll v. TreiberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Spenningsby v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Wheat v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API