Legal Opinion

Casey v. Hulgan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1889No. 13,294PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.

This is an action by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages because of alleged slanderous words spoken by the appellant of and concerning the appellee.

The complaint contains six paragraphs, and each paragraph contains several sets of words.

To each paragraph and to each set of words in the several paragraphs the appellant demurred; the court overruled the demurrers, and the proper exceptions were reserved.

The appellant filed an answer in general denial only, and the issues joined were submitted to a jury, who thereafter returned a verdict for the appellee. After the return of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Logan v. LoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Works v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Blickenstaff v. PerrinIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. De Pew v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Harrison v. FindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Barker v. PrizerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Downs v. CassidyMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Emig v. DaumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Bradford v. McBrideIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API