Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 7, 1925No. A-5339PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

For brevity the plaintiff in error will be referred to as the defendant; he assigns error as follows: First, that he was not allowed sufficient time for counsel to prepare his defense; second, that negroes were excluded from the jury panel for the sole reason that they were negroes; third, that the court erred in denying a change of venue.

The evidence on the part of the state shows the following state of facts: That Frank Daniels, the slain man, was a driver of a Buick service car at McAlester. On the night of July 23, 1924, after the trains on the Rock Island had passed, a colored man, who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McConvilleIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Coffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Gallego v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Prescott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API