Scott v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
For brevity the plaintiff in error will be referred to as the defendant; he assigns error as follows: First, that he was not allowed sufficient time for counsel to prepare his defense; second, that negroes were excluded from the jury panel for the sole reason that they were negroes; third, that the court erred in denying a change of venue.
The evidence on the part of the state shows the following state of facts: That Frank Daniels, the slain man, was a driver of a Buick service car at McAlester. On the night of July 23, 1924, after the trains on the Rock Island had passed, a colored man, who…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McIntosh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. McConvilleIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Coffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
- Gallego v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- Prescott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.