Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Broad Street National Bank

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 2, 1918PublishedCited by 33 opinions

On bill, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Backes, V. C.

The question in this case is, Who is entitled to the proceeds of life insurance policies, the beneficiary named in the policies or the assignee of the insured? The proceeds are in court. The facts stipulated by counsel are:

The New York Life Insurance Company, at the instance of William O. Anderson, issued to him two policies in each of which it

“Promises to pay at the Home Office of the Company in the City of New York, upon receipt at said Home Office of due proof of the death of AVilliam O. Anderson, herein called the insured, Five thousand dollars, less any indebtedness hereon,…

2Cited by33 opinions

  1. Schoenholz v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Douglass v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Merchants Bank v. GarrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Taylor v. Southern Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Matthews v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API