Rigney v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Chief Judge.
The petitioner is the plaintiff in a pending lawsuit and via this special action challenges the respondent court’s granting the motion of defendants Puckett to amend their answer and, in accordance therewith, amending the pre-trial order. The sequence of events is as follows.
The plaintiff, while riding as a passenger in a car owned by K & D Construction Company, and driven by Kenneth K. Kam-rath, was injured when the Kamrath vehicle collided with a vehicle driven by Mr. Puckett. She filed suit against the Puck-etts, Kamrath, K & D Construction Company, M. M. Sundt…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kennecott Copper Corporation v. McDowellArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Burrell v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Landers v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fleitz v. Van WestrienenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Frances McDonald and Joy McDonald v. Nancy Petree and Holly Ann HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Matusik v. Arizona Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- McDonald v. PetreeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005