Legal Opinion

Afoa v. Port of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2013No. 85784-9PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

¶1 Should we extend to the Port of Seattle (Port), which owns and operates Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport), the principles of liability imposed on other entities that control the common area of a multiemployer workplace? Brandon Afoa was paralyzed in an accident while he was working at Sea-Tac Airport and seeks to recover from the Port on three theories we have applied in other multiemployer workplace cases: as a business invitee; for breach of safety regulations under the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act of 1973 (WISHA), chapter 49.17 RCW; and the duty of a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Richard J. Teal and Tina Teal v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Iwai v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. H.B.H. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. McKown v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Martinez-Cuevas v. DeRuyter Bros. Dairy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Afoa v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Wilcox v. BasehoreWashington Supreme Court · 2017

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API