Legal Opinion

Chilton and Juden v. Drainage Dist.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This suit was instituted in the Circuit Court of Pemiscot county, on February 28, 1929. Petitioners state that plaintiffs are engaged as partners, doing business under the firm name of Democrat-Argus, and engaged in the publication of a newspaper, known as the “Democrat-Argus” in the city of Caruthersville. The suit is for the collection of costs of publication in diver suits for delinquent drainage taxes due defendant, which publications or notices, it is alleged, are required by law. The amounts due the defendant, together with dates are set out in an itemized statement and judgment is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Childs v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Sweet v. MaupinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Davis v. Jacksonville Southeastern LineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ruehling v. Pickwick-Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Newman v. WeinsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Chilton v. Drainage District No. 8Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Chilton and Juden v. Drainage DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API