Legal Opinion

Newman v. Weinstein

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Though the record does not so show, the points involved on the appeal not going to the merits of the action, the statement appears unquestioned in plaintiffs' brief that the action is one for the balance due plaintiffs for legal services rendered.

The case originated in a justice's court in the city of St. Louis, wherein the original defendants were Moritz Weinstein and Bertha Sperling. Upon a trial before the justice, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs, and against defendant Moritz Weinstein, for the sum of $240, together with costs of suit, and the cause was dismissed as to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Town of Carrollton v. RhombergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. State ex rel. South St. Joseph Town Co. v. MosmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. State Ex Rel. Dolman v. Dickey.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WoodsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Miller v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Campbell v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Fenton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. McDowell v. LibbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Bridge Development Co. v. VurroMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. City of St. Louis v. Senter Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API