Legal Opinion
Shamblin v. City of Colchester
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided April 16, 1992No. 91-1078PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McDADE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion To Amend Counterclaim And To Extend Discovery Deadline (Doc. 18, Part 1). For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s motion is denied. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Defendant seeks to amend its counterclaim against Plaintiff by adding a Count II based upon the Plaintiff’s alleged breach of fiduciary duty to the City while employed as a police officer. Defendant claims that on or about December 13, 1991, it was served with the Plaintiff’s Supplemental Response to Defendant’s first Set of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- LaFaut v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. John T. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Warshawsky & Company v. Arcata National Corporation and Arcata Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Harbor Insurance v. Continental Bank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Unique Concepts, Incorporated, and Floyd M. Baslow v. Ted Manuel and Upholstered Wall Works, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sparrow v. Mazda American CreditDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
- Hart v. Clayton-Parker and Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1994
- Williams v. LongDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Berckeley Investment Group, Ltd. v. ColkittDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Crosby Yacht Yard, Inc. v. Yacht "Chardonnay"District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.