Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Saunders v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1987No. 87-316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We deny the writ because relator has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law by way of appeal to the Court of Appeals for Allen County. R.C. 2731.05; Civ. R. 3(G); State, ex rel. *16Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, 40 O.O. 2d 141, 228 N.E. 2d 631. See Hoffman v. Knaus (App. 1952), 72 Ohio Law Abs. 389, 135 N.E. 2d 700; Fuller v. Fuller (1972), 32 Ohio App. 2d 303, 61 O.O. 2d 400, 290 N.E. 2d 852. Moreover, the writ will not issue to control judicial discretion. R.C. 2731.03; State, ex rel. Sawyer, v. O’Connor (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 380, 8 O.O. 3d 393, 377…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Sawyer v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Coleman v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Fuller v. FullerOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Glassman v. GlassmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Florence v. ZitterOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. Wood v. McCrystalOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API