Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided May 8, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00002Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DANITA MCKENZIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case Number: 2:23-cv-00002-JHE ) THOMAS CLEVELAND, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 Plaintiff Danita McKenzie (“McKenzie” or “Plaintiff”) has filed an amended complaint alleging Defendants Deputy Thomas Cleveland (“Cleveland”), Deputy Jesse Adams (“Adams”), and Deputy Christopher Wade (“Wade”) (collectively “Defendants”) violated her rights pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and Alabama law. (Doc. 5). Defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API