Morgan v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
GUILLOT, Justice.
Robert Ross Morgan appeals his conviction for robbery. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement for not less than two and not more than seven years. In his sole ground of error, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. We disagree. For the reasons stated below, we reform the sentence and, as reformed, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
The record reveals that appellant was in a J.C. Penney store when he grabbed a number of coats off a rack and attempted to leave the store without paying for them. Appellant attempted to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Ulloa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Candelaria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Arnold v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2000
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Arturo Reyes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.