Legal Opinion

Diamante, LLC v. Dye

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 5, 2013No. CV-13-467PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Justice.

11 Diamante, LLC (Diamante), appeals the orders of the Saline County Circuit Court granting the motion of appellees, Gary Dye and Linda Dye, for class-action certification. This order is immediately appealable pursuant to Ark. R.App. P.-Civ. 2(a)(9) (2012). On appeal, Diamante argues that the circuit court abused its discretion by (1) ruling that the class counsel is qualified and is not a likely, necessary witness; (2) ruling that the class representatives met the adequacy requirement and that they do not have a conflict of interest in representing members of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Asbury Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Williamson v. Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Cheqnet Systems, Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. DIRECTV, Inc. v. MurraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Veterans Affairs v. OkekeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. GGNSC Arkadelphia, LLC v. LambSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. Seeco, Inc. v. StewmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Autry v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Diamante, LLC v. DyeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API