Legal Opinion

Moody v. R. Hoe & Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Levy county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief-Justice delivered the opinion of the court:

R. Hoe & Co. recovered a judgment in the Circuit Court of Levy county against T. A. Darby and Burkhalter & Co., Strauss, Pritz & Co., and Malin, Fowler & Co., recovered judgments against Chafer & Darby in said county. Executions were issued on these judgments and levied on fifty-eight head of mules and horses. George N. Moody, the plaintiff in error, claimed the property under section 22, p. 524, McC’s. Dig., and made an affidavit and bond. The affidavit states that the property was levied on by the sheriff of said county, by virtue of all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paxton v. BoyceTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Betton v. WillisSupreme Court of Florida · 1847

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Volusia County Bank v. BigelowSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  3. Baars v. CrearySupreme Court of Florida · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API