Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. Hollis

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 7, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01015Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION TIMOTHY MARCUS MAYBERRY, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:22-CV-1015-DRL-MGG BRIAN HOLLIS and MEA PORTER, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Timothy Marcus Mayberry, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 2. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API