Legal Opinion

Byrnes v. Ladew

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to vacate an order for the examination of the defendants before trial.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

As the defendants move, upon plaintiff’s own papers, to vacate the order for their examination before trial, the application, although on notice^ is properly heard at Part II of the Special Term. Code, § 772, last clause; Sturz v. Fischer, herewith decided.

The complaint exhibits a cause of action against defendants for injury from a defective elevator.

Upon allegations, in an affidavit, that the plaintiff is unahle to “ ascertain ” whether the defendants, or somebody else, are responsible for his injury — in other words, whether he has a cause of action against them. — he proposes to examine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re NolanNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Britton v. MacdonaldNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  3. Churchman v. MerrittNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Douglass v. MeyerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York State Banking Co. v. Van AntwerpNew York Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API