New York State Banking Co. v. Van Antwerp
New York Supreme Court
Motion to vacate an. order directing an examination, at the instance of said banking company of said Van Antwerp as an expected party defendant to an action hereafter to be brought.
1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.
The affidavit upon which the original order of examination was made, amongst other things, sets out in'substance that the above banking company is the holder of two certain promissory notes each made by “ S. Van Antwerp, agent,” and upon which action is about to be brought in the Supreme Court against the said Mary A. Van Antwerp; that for several years the said S. Van Antwerp who executed said notes has been conducting a business under the name of S. Van Antwerp, agent, and that at the time said notes were made and prior thereto the said S. Van Antwerp, who is the husband of the said Mary A.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Muller v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Greene v. CareyNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Pots v. HermanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Churchman v. MerrittNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Manufacturers & Traders' Bank v. LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.