Legal Opinion

City & County of Broomfield v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 2010No. 09SA178PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

I. Introduction

In this appeal, the Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company ("FRICO") asks us to review the water court's finding that the City and County of Broomfield's ("Broomfield") application for a change in the use of water rights would not injuriously affect the water rights of others. FRICO alleges that the water court erred by not considering numerous tables and calculations that FRICO included in its post-trial proposed decree. The water court characterized FRICO's post-trial tables and calculations as new evidence not subject to cross-examination. FRICO disputes this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Consolidated Mutual Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Wilson v. Board of Regents of the University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Pueblo West Metropolitan District v. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Miller v. ReederSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  5. Pagosa Area Water & Sanitation District v. Trout UnlimitedSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burlington Ditch Reservoir & Land Co. v. Metro Wastewater Reclamation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. City & County of Broomfield v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  3. in Interest of C.W.B., JrSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  4. Arapahoe Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. People Ex Rel. D.Z.B.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  5. People in re C.W.B., JrColorado Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API