Legal Opinion
City & County of Broomfield v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 27, 2010No. 09SA269PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
I. Introduction
In this appeal, we review the water court's award of costs against Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company ("FRICO") for the trial concerning the City and County of Broomfield's ("Broomfield") application for a change in the use of water rights. See City & Cnty. of Broomfield v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co., 235 P.3d 296, 298-99 (Colo.2010). Pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, a court may award costs to a prevailing party, but the court may not award costs against the State of Colorado, its officers or its agencies, unless provided by law.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. HouserColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Garcia v. Schneider Energy Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Antero Resources Corp. v. StrudleySupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- McGihon v. CaveColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Fiscus v. Liberty Mortgage Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.