Legal Opinion
Hill v. United States Postal Service
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 3, 1981No. 77 Civ. 3294 (JMC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANNELLA, District Judge:
After a trial on the merits of plaintiff’s amended complaint, the Court finds for defendants. The amended complaint is dismissed.
FACTS
Plaintiff Arthur Hill, a black man, alleges that the former policies and practices maintained by defendants, the United States Postal Service and several of its officials, respecting the employment of individuals with criminal records, discriminated against him in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the due process clause of the fifth amendment. 1 Hill and three other…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A.B. & S. Auto Service, Inc. v. South Shore Bank of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Joyce v. Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012