Legal Opinion
Rosen v. Hursh
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 6, 1971No. 3-71-Civ.-25PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are members of the class represented in Kostohryz, et al v. Hursh, 329 F.Supp. 319 (D. Minn. July 6, 1971), and their challenge to reductions of AFDC benefits under Section VII— 2224.04 of the Minnesota Public Welfare Manual, the “stepfather” regulation, as being inconsistent with federal law is identical to that presented in Kostohryz. Our decision today in Kostohryz, a copy of which is attached, is thus controlling and dispositive as to this issue here. Accordingly,
It is ordered that this cause of action as it relates to the validity of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wyman v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kostohryz v. HurshDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Green v. Dept. of Institutions and AgenciesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rosen v. HurshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Rosen v. HurshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972